UID4185
威望30
金钱38103
交易诚信度0
主题10
帖子426
注册时间2001-11-21
QQ
最后登录2026-2-19
高级会员
   
交易诚信度0
注册时间2001-11-21
|
马上注册 家电论坛,众多有奖活动等你来参与!
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册
x
本帖最后由 Shinji 于 2018-7-6 19:35 编辑
这牌子的功放我没有听过,但是朋友给推荐过,中文媒体的普遍说法是音色不错推力也很好。勃总对8000A和8000S的评价也很高。但是我看英国what hifi对这牌子的8000S,8200A,8300A(看评测发表时间都是国产之后的货)和国外论坛网友对这牌子的功放的音色评价很糟糕。
https://www.whathifi.com/audiola ... type=review&pos=top
以上是what hifi对8000S的评测,重点是There's little richness, so if you want an easy listen, best look elsewhere,This is no rhythm machine. It fails to cohere like Roksan's Kandy does, and the 8000S also lacks authority at the lowest frequencies, sounding overly crisp in the wrong system.
https://www.whathifi.com/audiola ... type=review&pos=top
以上是what hifi对8200A的评测,重点是Sounds too clinical.needs careful system matching if forceful treble isn’t to annoy However, play something low-key such as Allison Krauss and Union Station’s Paper Airplane and there’s something missing.
It’s the kind of natural warmth and subtlety class leaders such as Roksan’s Kandy K2 have in abundance. A little more rhythmic integrity wouldn’t go amiss, either.
The 8200A is impressive, and can inform excellently, but it doesn’t stir the soul enough. Some rivals manage both.
https://www.whathifi.com/audiola ... type=review&pos=top
以上是what hifi对8300A的评测,重点是Despite all this obvious talent we’re not totally bowled over with the overall performance. Compared with alternatives from the likes of Rega and Naim, the Audiolab is a little short in its sense of rhythmic drive. The 8300A doesn’t communicate the changing momentum of a piece of music as well as we’d like.
That means the initial build-up of tension in The Dead Weather’s 60 Feet Tall isn’t particularly obvious. Similarly, the sheer energy and drive in OutKast’s Hey Ya! Is diluted, meaning a notable slice of the song’s sense of fun is lost.
It doesn’t help that the amplifier isn’t flawless in the way it communicates low-level dynamic shifts either. Nina Simone’s vocals on the haunting Strange Fruit come through with less passion than we’re used to, while the steadily growing power in Arvo Part’s Tabula Rasa doesn’t have the impact we’d expect.
The story is much the same through the phono stage. It’s a decent effort with low levels of noise and a good amount of insight, but also loses some of the solidity and authority of the line stages.
https://www.stereo.net.au/forums ... es-it-compare-with/
以上是一个澳大利亚论坛对audiolab功放的讨论,摘录如下
1、Pretty clinical and dry sounding
2、Agree with bwhitesox. Audiolab the sound is on the dry side but very good on dynamic & punchy.Very Good for Movies but a bit dry for Music.
3、Sad to say, my taste was not sophisticated enough for Audiolab; I even found the Cyrus a little dry for me but I discovered all the above in the shop audition - there really was no need to take the Audiolab home to try, they weren't for me.
4、 Well built, rather hard sounding, but with excellent ability to cope with difficult load impedances.
5、I agree about the amps. I found them a bit lifeless and flat sounding.
6、They sound a tad thin and dry in the bass, but have a clean, sharp sound. Sonically, they were not a good match for my VAF I-93 speakers,
综合以上的结论是audiolab功放的推力不错,声音明亮干净清脆充满细节,声场开阔。但是声音clinical(过分平淡),干、硬,没有节奏感或者说韵律感(This is no rhythm machine.)。为何what hifi和国外论坛上的评价和中文媒体和论坛上的差别这么大?难道老外的耳朵不一样?还是他们不盲目迷信所谓英国声?还有一点,这牌子网络上的文案把一系列的产品放一起,然后标上what hifi五星推荐,其实audiolab得过what hifi五星推荐的只有CD机和解码器,功放从来没有得过what hifi五星,这种文案给人感觉就是有点故意混淆视听了。
|
|