等离子电视远逊于直射LED背光LCD TV

yewan

原帖由 mkdw 于 2010-6-5 09:45 发表
世人皆知液晶（没办法，液晶显示器电脑用户太多了）而不知等离子。不少人认为这几年电脑流行用液晶，自然液晶是最先进的东西，电视也该用液晶。再有就是绝大部分人有从众心理，别人用液晶多，我也用，主流的东西不会 ...

支持

友山

三星C8000和松下的VT20欧洲AVS论坛的评测结果出来了,VT20优秀级评价,C8000只是高于平均水平评价。下面就坐等索尼、LG两款3D液晶的评测了。
三星C8000评测英文链接地址》》》》》http://www.avforums.com/review/Samsung-C8000-UE46C8000-46C8000-8000-3DTV-HDTV-Review.html
松下VT20评测英文链接地址》》》》》》http://www.avforums.com/review/P ... -Plasma-Review.html
以上评测全部出自》》》》》》》》http://www.avforums.com/reviews/index.php?search_special=1&parent=114

[ 本帖最后由 友山 于 2010-6-5 11:12 编辑 ]

yack15

液晶用户多，说明液晶厂家和商家忽悠的本领高。

1974ahlay

MP3用户大大超过CD用户！一般人没有时间精力去追求高品质的东西而已

cnmrg

Conclusion
The UE46C8000 has many fine attributes including an elegant design, numerous features like Internet TV and comprehensive calibration controls. The calibrated greyscale performance was excellent, the calibrated colour gamut was very good and video processing was superb but all this was compromised by very poor backlight uniformity. It is a shame that in their efforts to push LED backlighting and ultra-slim displays Samsung have allowed marketing imperatives to impact on image quality, especially at this price point!

The addition of 3D is a nice feature to have and it certainly provides a degree of future proofing but the jury is still out on 3D at home. At lot will obviously depend on content but there aren’t actually that many 3D films on release and I can’t really see 3D Blu-rays taking off in the near future. Sport definitely benefits from the added dimensionality so Sky’s new 3D channel may prove popular but I feel that pubs and clubs seem a more appropriate venue for 3D sporting events. That leaves 3D gaming and it is here that I think the greatest potential exists. Whist Avatar isn’t the best game you can buy the addition of 3D improved it immeasurably and as soon as you removed the glasses the game felt flat and uninvolving. However unless the price of active shutter glasses falls quite quickly the manufacturers could have problems marketing this particular technology to consumers and personally I found cross talk to be a real problem with LCD 3D displays, when compared to 3D plasma displays.

Ultimately this is a very capable display with excellent greyscale and colour performance and superb processing, sadly poor backlight uniformity compromises its 2D performance and cross talk hinders its 3D potential. The price is also an issue when you add up all the pros and cons.

espring

原帖由 1974ahlay 于 2010-6-5 11:23 发表
MP3用户大大超过CD用户！一般人没有时间精力去追求高品质的东西而已

言之有理！

vivaliberty

有什么样的看客，就有什么样的电视机。

与数字跳舞

等离子只有粉，很少有枪。晶枪很多，为何？晶厂多，为争夺市场，什么三教九流的营销都有！等离子的优势：
1、纯数字驱动，色彩更精准。（LED换个背光就数字了？[s:97] ）
2、急速响应，画面无拖尾，动态清晰度高。（LED换个背光液晶分子偏转就急速了？[s:97] ）
3、目前等离子起步都是10bits单色驱动。（LED换个背光液晶面板色位就增加了？[s:97] ）
4、自发光，画面柔和细腻，对比度控制精细。（LED换个背光就变自发光了？[s:97] ）

斯哥诺

LED就是本世纪最大忽悠的噱头，在精枪的概念中，LED是LCD的新一代[s:97]

q17777

就是哄哄你这种SB，数字处理越多环节，效果越不好，何况液晶本来就晕乎乎的画质，你们不要做缺德事了！

风风风筝

利润，还是利润在作怪。

液晶成本低，价格却卖得很高，众厂家还不竞相追逐？所以从数量上来评价画质优劣是人云亦云的表现。

franch

PDP的软肋在于松下的垄断，如果开放技术，LCD算个P。一个脑袋毕竟比不上一百个脑袋，技术更新上不及LCD，
虽然LCD在我看来本来就是静态的显示技术或落后的动态显示技术。但现在有这么多人参与，UPDATE的速度就不同了。


电视必竟最后还是看活动的画面为主

dwtla

原帖由 1974ahlay 于 2010-6-5 11:23 发表
MP3用户大大超过CD用户！一般人没有时间精力去追求高品质的东西而已

追求品质、讲究而又愿意仔细研究的人毕竟是少数。

sboys

LZ说的两点都是等离子的绝对优势啊，
1响应速度，PDP跟LCD不同的显示原理导致了，PDP绝对更快
2PDP貌似就是以发色多而著称

lookit52

PDP的天生缺陷有，功耗，发热量，烧屏，电流声
就目前的技术来说，其实只有烧屏的问题无法根本解决，毕竟正常使用没有人能接受超过20个像素的像素移动，而少于20个像素的移动根本不能解决烧屏的问题，所以PDP永远没法用于电脑
但是反过来看，PDP的这些天生缺陷没有任何一样是影响画面效果的。
再看看液晶，响应速度，发色率，背光，这些问题是液晶的缺陷，但可悲的是，这些缺陷却样样影响画质
至于为什么液晶成为市场主流，原因确实太多了，就如同从理论上讲精简指令集优于复杂指令集，但是最终统治桌面电脑的却是采用复杂指令集的CPU一样，很可悲的讲，功夫在戏外