UID706190
威望2
金钱6306
交易诚信度0
主题5
帖子135
注册时间2010-7-7
最后登录2018-4-25
初级会员
 
交易诚信度0
注册时间2010-7-7
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-7-14 23:22
|
显示全部楼层
[s:29]原帖由 lantency 于 2010-7-14 19:10 发表 
“real white color”是啥?
如果你指的是白色的正确性,那只要色温正确就可以了,松下肯定是没问题的。
如果你指的是亮度,那我要提醒你,比较的前提是AB机器都经过了D65校正.你自己可以看看评测,松下亮度根本 ...
yes I know...Because i have panasonic PZ 700 before....
But about the~~~ Black level & white color~~~...I prefer Samsung...
The Panasonics certainly start out with better blacks than the Samsungs but after a few hundred hours the difference shrinks to effectively nothing, both will be at least 20 times worse than a G9 Pioneer Kuro so Panasonic and Samsung have a very long way to go to get anything even close to black. At the current rate of progress they will take 10 years to catch up and LCD’s are improving faster than that. Even last years good LCD’s without local dimming had similar blacks and contrast to current Plasmas, and local dimming LCD’s have the potential be a lot better (provided they are not edge lit). Good LCD’s easily outperform Plasmas for blacks under moderate to bright lighting due to better screen filters.
The screen filter on the C7000 is certainly very good by Plasma standards, but its still not up with a good LCD.
If a Samsung and Panasonic are both calibrated and set up for the same light output with the same level of display sharpening there should be no difference in “clarity” between them with HD source.
The sharpest picture is usually not the best picture and the Samsungs look quite overdone with excessive contrast, colour and sharpening with default settings.
[s:15]
[ 本帖最后由 toysonline 于 2010-7-14 23:37 编辑 ] |
|